SPL : The domestic implications of the Lebanon crisis
I argued on 27th June that "There's even a possibility that Blair might enjoy a period of relative resurgence over the summer months". I referred back to last summer, when a brief lull in Blair's opinion ratings was quickly turned around as he played statesman for London's Olympic bid, at the G8, and after the bombings in London.
A similar situation may arise here. The British people, I think, love a statesman - remember Thatcher's party election broadcast, which depicted her touring the world, shaking hands with a multitude of leaders? Making deals with world leaders - even while on holiday - conveys this statesman-like aurora well, as conveyed by interviews in the cabinet room (see here) and, however much we don't like it on the surface, press conferences with George Bush.
When much of politics is symbolism, the image of Blair the statesman moralising and making assertions on the Lebanon crisis is bound to play favourably to the British public. It is a pity that the G8 summit in a temporarily-transformed St Petersburg passed unnoticed, except for a boon for Putin; nevertheless, the current crisis in the Lebanon is likely to bolster this position in the run-up to Labour's difficult autumn conference, although the generally accepted departure date of summer/autumn next year is unlikely to shift.








1 Comments:
SPL's back!
I disagree that Blair will benefit from his statesman role in the crisis. He spent far too long not calling for a ceasefire, going against public opinion, the opinion of the Labour party and reportedly the opinions of some cabinet members. If anything Tony's statesman role has forced the cabinet to take a good look at the PM and themselves. I'm hoping the cabinet may be a little more independant in future.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home